Child care and protection index 1817-1942

Entries
NameSurnameAgeInstitutionRecord TypeDate of CommittalDate of DischargeRemarksCitation
LeslieBARNESMittagong Farm Home For BoysRegister of Committals11/11/1915See p 297 No.1 Register /Child dischargedNRS 13361 [8/1756]; Reel 1872, Page 009Details
Mation NoreenBALL16 yrs 3 mthsIndustrial Schools 1887-1925Admission, discharge and after career register30/07/192321/10/1924Apprenticed to Mrs BRIERLEY of AshfieldNRS 14730 [5/4838]; Reel 3850, Page 295-296Details
SusanBAKER4 yrsProtestant Orphan School (Female)Admissions book03/04/1838-NRS 12266 [1]; COD 506, Page 005Details
JohnBALES13 yrs 7 mths - DOB 15 May 1899Mittagong Farm Home For BoysRegister of Committals10/12/1912Transfer to Brush FarmNRS 13361 [8/1755]; Reel 1872, Page 022Details
EdmundBEACH10 yrs 10 mths - DOB 24 Dec 1897Mittagong Farm Home For BoysRegister of Committals19/10/1908Boarded outNRS 13361 [8/1755]; Reel 1872, Page 012Details
Ernest DavidBAKER12 yrs 10 mths - DOB 24 May 1899Mittagong Farm Home For BoysRegister of Committals11/03/1912Boarded out 5 yearsNRS 13361 [8/1755]; Reel 1872, Page 020Details
CatherineBEAHANIndustrial SchoolsDischarge Register10/03/1899To her friendsNRS 14723 [5/4837]; Reel 3852, Page 269-270Details
Catherine AnnBALL12 yrs 9 mthsIndustrial Schools 1887-1925Admission, discharge and after career register16/02/189426/05/1899-NRS 14730 [5/4838]; Reel 3850, Page 497-498Details
John NicholasBAUMAN7 yrsRandwick Asylum for Destitute ChildrenRegister of Inmates27/07/1870-NRS 13362 [2]; Reel 1866, Page 315, Number 2058Details
SusannahBECKIndustrial SchoolsDischarge Register04/12/1890Discharged to Mr W JACKSON, Port StephenNRS 14723 [5/4837]; Reel 3852, Page 171-172Details

Showing 1 - 10 of 21,292 results

of  2130

This index combines: Mittagong Farm home for Boys (1907-1921); Randwick Asylum for Destitute Children (1852-1915); Orphan schools records (1817-1886) and Industrial schools records (1867-1942).

Warning: Some of the information, language and opinions contained within this index may be viewed as offensive due to the context in which the records were created.